Monday, February 25, 2013
2013 Academy Awards
photo: The Oscar statuette, or the Academy Award, but actually officially called the Academy Award of Merit, from Oscars.com.
Not too much to say about this award show. I saw most of the nominated films, including:
Prometheus, which I can't believe I never wrote a blog for. Look for that blog entry after the next.
Skyfall, which will have an upcoming entry.
Zero Dark Thirty, which will be the subject of my next blog entry.
Lincoln (click the link for the blog entry)
Silver Linings Playbook (click the link for the blog entry)
Django Unchained (click the link for the blog entry)
Argo (click the link for the blog entry)
The Hobbit (click the link for the blog entry)
So I had a pretty good feel, for once, for the show, and who should win. I haven't seen Life of Pi yet, or Amour, which may be way too depressing for me. But just about everything else, so--
--Christoph Waltz over Tommy Lee Jones, in Lincoln, or Robert De Niro in Silver Linings Playbook? Waltz, as I mentioned in the entry for the movie, essentially repeated his Inglorious Bastards role, this time with a conscience. Jones ate scenery in Lincoln, as he does so often, and he's won twice (I think) before. But De Niro was very un- De Niro in his role. Both deserved it more than Waltz, who I like, by the way. And Waltz has won for the same director, too. Probably the one who deserved it most was Philip Seymour Hoffman, who did not repeat a role here, or play himself, which Alan Arkin basically did. Seymour Hoffman played a cult leader, therefore having to act outside himself, but nobody saw this film, and those who did were sort of turned off in general. Almost every prognosticator I read said he should win, but wouldn't. Nobody picked Waltz. This was a surprise. Ultimately, of course, none of this matters. Go see the films.
--Apparently, belting "Gold--FIN--GAH!!!" deserves a standing ovation. Tripping up the stairs did, too. But Massey and Lawrence handled themselves very well, and I was happy for their happiness.
--It would've been nice to see all the Bonds together, though I doubt Connery would've been willing to show up. It wasn't quite the Bond celebration I was hoping for, or expecting.
--Hollywood showed its respect, big-time, for Tarantino. Who's gotten very big, very fast, by the way. And I'm talking, like, physically.
--I'm okay with Ang Lee winning Best Director, as he's a well-respected guy who's never gotten his due. It doesn't matter to me because my pick would have been Kathryn Bigelow for Zero Dark Thirty. The controversy centered around the non-nomination of Ben Affleck, but, as I mentioned in another entry, Bigelow had a much more challenging job with more difficult material to direct. Probably Lee did, too, though the sheer amount of CGI in this film worries me a little. But Life of Pi's cinematographer won, too, so maybe there wasn't as much CGI as I thought. So I guess I'm okay with it, though again I see that Hollywood continues to give Spielberg the finger.
--Jennifer Lawrence's and Daniel Day-Lewis's wins were givens. The surprise was that Day-Lewis was very amusing when accepting his award. Lincoln himself may have had much more of a sense of humor than what I thought Day-Lewis had. Speaking of Lawrence, she was the talk of the town at my job the day after the awards--for tripping up the stairs.
--As there is a separation of Church and State, maybe there should be a separation of Hollywood and State as well. How starstruck do we want our politicians to be? I like the Obamas, of course, but I don't know if I want the First Lady giving away the award for Best Picture. Why couldn't Jack Nicholson have done it?
--Seth McFarlane did a good job when he didn't have the stars themselves in his cross-hairs. The breast song was amusing, but probably a turn-off to the stars themselves, as was his Ben Affleck / Gigli comment to Affleck himself. The Clooney joke fell flat to everyone, including Clooney, and I'll bet McFarlane was feeling the heat of those jokes, judging by the number of times he grimaced when he knew he was taking a chance with a joke. But he was very breezy through most of it, and he gets away with a lot because of his natural demeanor, and smile. Since the Awards ratings were up 19%, I'm guessing he'll be asked back next year. But he'll have to lay off the comments at the stars themselves, and I'll bet many of them will not be happy to see him again.
--Argo winning for best picture, without being nominated for any acting or directing awards, smells to me like Hollywood awarding itself, as the movie could've been re-named How Hollywood Saved the Hostages.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I recommend you check out "A Bronx Tale" for another un-De Niro type of role. I think he sometimes plays the emotional roles more convincingly than his usual angry intimidating characters.
ReplyDeleteI agree there should be a separation of Hollywood and State. No matter how centered on politics the some of movies were in 2012, there is a time and a place the First Lady to show up. The Oscars weren't it.
Jennifer Lawrence was undoubtedly adorable through out the entire night. She may have surpassed Ben Affleck as my celebrity crush of the night. Quite a feat!
I've seen "A Bronx Tale" and your assessment is correct. But it's been a long, long time since a performance like that in a film like that. When did that come out? 1993 or so? And I think he directed that movie, too, so maybe that had something to do with his performance. That said, another point is that Silver Linings Playbook isn't even his type of movie to be in. Is he taking more chances, or just being offered fewer roles?
DeleteYes he directed "A Bronx Tale" in 1993. He's made some dramatic and comedic choices through the years so it's not completely out of his comfort zone. Di Nero's father was believed to be bi-polar and depressed so undoubtedly that performance hit him close to home.
ReplyDelete